August 8, 2003
@ 06:52 AM

Jörg ist current checking out dotText. He very much likes the admin interface and says it's very cute. And not only that. I had a glimpse and I have to agree. I think it's fantastic that Scott and us are releasing such big chunks of public code for the same purpose at the same time, but there is no "vs.". I think .Text is cool.

The most striking between the two engines is that .Text sits on SQL and ours uses plain text files. What I found through the email feedback I've gotten is that a lot of people who want to use dasBlog have their stuff sitting at some ISP and either don't have a SQL Server to talk to or the setup is too much of a hassle. So for them, the plain text storage makes more sense. I was about to rip it out and replace the file storage with a SQL backend as well, but now I am quite happy that I didn't.

(Although i have to admit that the transaction-loving architect in me still opposes the whole idea of using plain text files for read/write in a concurrent environment)

The second difference is that I started the whole thing only a bit more than 3 weeks ago from a copy of BlogX.

Categories: dasBlog

Sunday, October 23, 2005 7:44:43 PM UTC
The reason I chose dasBlog is because its easy to back up the whole contents. Just download all the Xml files. Restoring is even better.

Not the same with Community Server and the others out there. [Commented 2 years after the post date, the question is still relevent.]
Comments are closed.